I will never buy a camera without a viewfinder – here’s why

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works

Home / Latest / Latest news / I will never buy a camera without a viewfinder – here’s why

I will never buy a camera without a viewfinder – here’s why

However good LCD screens get, I will always want a camera that offers viewfinder shooting.



Jon Stapley




Jon Stapley


Panasonic Lumix G9 II viewfinder

The G9 II’s viewfinder is large, bright and clear. Credit: Andy Westlake

I’m not averse to a cheap compact camera for travel and casual snapping, and I was interested to see Panasonic bringing out the Lumix ZS300/TZ300. However, there was one feature missing from the spec that, I’m sorry to say, meant that I wouldn’t even be considering buying it.

That’s right – no viewfinder. This is a purely personal thing for me – I don’t think it will or should be the case for everybody – but I will never buy a camera without a viewfinder, no matter how big and sharp its LCD screen is. And here, since you ask, are my key reasons why…

1. Immersion

This is absolutely critical for me. When I’m composing a frame, I like to be wholly focused on doing just that. The kids call it ‘locking in’, and it’s one of the things I enjoy most about photography. No background distractions, no peripheral concerns – just me and the rectangular slice of the world that I’m capturing.

When I’m composing on a screen, holding it at arm’s length, I just don’t get that same level of total immersion in the activity. I’m still too aware of my surroundings, too distracted, and it can become easy to second-guess myself and become convinced that a greater shot might lie elsewhere. 

In my opinion, it’s a big part of why phone photography always feels a bit disposable, even though the quality of smartphone cameras has improved dramatically. You just can’t lock in the way you do when you’re closing one eye and pressing the other to the viewfinder.

No matter how good a camera’s screen is, you can’t beat viewfinder shooting. Photo credit: Andy Westlake

2. Screen fatigue

Before you start – yes, I know that an electronic viewfinder is a screen. You’re not being clever by pointing it out. Don’t email me. 

But what can I say? To me, it doesn’t feel like one. Maybe it’s because we don’t operate it the same way we do a touchscreen. Or maybe it’s because manufacturers like Fujifilm have found clever ways to deliver hybrid optical and electronic viewfinders. 

But the point is this: like many of us, I suffer from screen fatigue. I spend all day looking at screens, and I don’t care for it. At those times when I want to throw my phone into a river, photography is the perfect balm, and so I prefer it when photography feels as little like operating my phone as possible. 

3. Rock-steady grip

When I’m shooting using the viewfinder, I’m holding the camera pressed to my face. The right hand is on the handgrip, elbow locked; the left hand is under the lens, elbow locked. This is a steady, well-supported position.

When I’m shooting using the screen, I’m holding the camera at arm’s length, or close to. The elbows are not locked, and the camera is nowhere near as well supported. The result? A detectable drop in hand-steadiness, and all my boasts about being able to shoot handheld at 1/15sec turning to ash.

Sure, the up-to-date, modern photographer has the asset of built-in stabilisation. But the tight-fisted, pretentious photographer (me), who insists on buying second-hand, and who refuses to replace devices that still work perfectly well (also me), does not. So, for me, the superior steadiness of viewfinder shooting is still an asset.

Fujifilm X-T30 III in use
Even a small camera like the X-T30 III finds room for a quality viewfinder. Photo credit: Andy Westlake

4. I like the choice!

This may seem like it flies in the face of everything I’ve just said, but I don’t use the viewfinder all the time. Sometimes, when I’m working at odd angles, or trying not to attract attention on the street, I make use of my camera’s tilting screen. 

Because ultimately, the main reason I’ll never buy a camera without a viewfinder is that I like choice. I like a tool that’s as flexible and versatile as possible – it’s one of the reasons I wasn’t really sold on Fujifilm’s admirable but misguided X-Pro3, with its flip-down screen.

So, as long as there’s a choice between a camera with a viewfinder and one without, I’ll always choose the former.

Related reading


The views expressed in this column are not necessarily those of Amateur Photographer magazine or Kelsey Media Limited. If you have an opinion you’d like to share on this topic, or any other photography related subject, email: [email protected]


Follow AP on FacebookInstagramYouTube and TikTok.

Profile image of Jon Stapley
Jon Stapley

About

Jon is a freelance journalist who has been writing features and reviews for Amateur Photographer for more than a decade. His writing also appears in Digital Camera World, Black + White Photography magazine, Photomonitor and many more. He's an avid film photographer, despite the expense, and has contributed a few features to AP on how to shoot film on the cheap. See more at jonstapley.com.




Jon Stapley

Related Articles

Stay Updated

Get the latest camera news, reviews and buying guides straight to your inbox.